Mt. Everest Case

Whitney Easterling Wce235 1. This tragedy occurred for many reasons, some of them being plain fallacy in judgment, weather, and the risk that goes along with climbing a unforgiving mountain. I believe that the roots of the problem were the leaders of this excursion. I dont debate they surface executed or balanced their want to complete a difficult and high-risk task with weighing what is logically safe and when they should maybe veer around. 2. Yes, if you logically look at the weather conditions of Mt. Everest and comp ar them with the likelihood of a person choosing to climb it to make a mistake, the betting odds would suggest that, inevitably, tragedies will occur. 3. I recollect that Fischer and Hall had the suffice to be good leaders but may go through valued their adrenaline rush and drive to blow over the expire of the mountain over the health of everyone on their expedition, how swimmingly things were going, and the deficiency of orga nization in it all.

For example, there was a huge dish out of miscommunication about oxygen tanks, as well as health problems of several people (including Fischer himself) that were all awful omens of things to come. I think that only strong leaders are able to barf aside their pride and determine when its time to desolate ship so that everyone doesnt cut down with it. I think their main poor decision was principally that they didnt fold around. Partly, I would attribute it to their pride and the another(prenominal) part I would attribute to their lack of oxygen distorting their archetype process and capability to reason.If you want to get a ! all-embracing essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay