Parents and Children in Despotic Societies

So many amours atomic number 18 passed graduate from upraise to child; a mothers eyes, a fathers laugh. only these arent the only things. Ideals, such(prenominal) as distrust for legitimate people, yearnings for individuality, and maybe dislikes for certain governments throne also be passed from parent to child. To a totalitarian society, this could exit to a of invigoration-or-death stain to their rule, which could be threatened by those who strongly oppose them. A dictator would expect parents spaced from children so they could stop larn from parents, and teach whatever propaganda they would want the kids to learn, and it gives older generations less to be gain vigorch for. The primary reason for any of these actions is that the leaders of the society would do whatever possible to obtain a their rule, even into prospective generations.\nWhen one analyzes the perspectives of the leaders in Ayn Rands, Anthem, one can see why the rulers would want to narrate childre n from their parents. Prometheus learns that [His son] will be taught to say I and to bear the self-exaltation of it,(100) which goes against everything that the government teaches. If Prometheus and others similar to him raise their own kids, the dynasty and way of life could be in hazard for those in charge. They could spread both of the slandering lies (or truths that you want to be hidden) they wanted, and those in charge would be helpless to stop them. In a few generations, assuming they are not reported, these messages and ideals could be current by many people, and move a revolution. If, as a regime, their primary goal is to become as long as possible, revolutions are not exactly what one want in the state of which the preside.\nThis brings the conversation to the discuss of the previous reason. In a totalitarian state, the worst thing one can do is give subjects the tools to rise against you. These tools arent unavoidably things like bombs and weapons. They can be as simple as thoughts of reform, o...